A woman who tattooed her boyfriend’s name on her forehead is defending her face art, suggesting that anyone who refuses to do the same, isn’t really in love.
Ana Stanskovsky, who penned a permanent love letter to Kevin on her face, insists it’s an expression of love, but online users are saying “it’s stupid” and that her “next boyfriend will hate it.”
Polish-born Ana Stanskovsky surprised her 588,000 TikTok followers by sharing a post of her newly transformed face.
In a viral TikTok clip, Stanskovsky is seen sitting in a chair, having some work done to her forehead.
The “my new face tattoo” video, which has 18.3 million views since it was first shared November 6, shows Stanskovsky getting her boyfriend’s name, penned in large black cursive letters, across her forehead.
The clip zooms in on the artist permanently inking over the stencil that reads “Kevin,” and Stanskovsky wincing in pain.
When the art is complete, she stands up to view her extreme expressions of love in the mirror.
“Done? Okay let’s see. Oh my God, I love it. Wow, Kevin’s gonna love it,” she says.
She finished the clip by asking her followers “Do you think he will like it?”
Responding to her question, one netizen jokes, “He’ll love it! Your next boyfriend will hate it though.” Another user writes, “I don’t know who Kevin is, but wherever you are…. Run!”
As the video hits the eyes of the puzzled social community, people are warning her of future regrets.
“Great decision here. I don’t see how you could ever regret this,” one fan shares.
Replying to the overwhelming suggestions of regret, Stanskovsky fired back with another clip saying she will never regret the Kevin tattoo.
Stanskvosky replies, “I know many of you said I’m gonna regret that and what if we break up and all of this stuff, all of this horrible stuff and I just wanna say this is how I’m expressing my feelings so if I love someone, I’m doing this.” She continues, “I’m loving it, I’m definitely never gonna regret that. How can I regret this? It’s beautiful.”
“A handwritten note is a precious way to express your feelings,” quips one cyber citizen. Fans still aren’t convinced, and many think her outrageous announcement of love must be a joke. “Wait. Wasn’t it a joke?” writes one while another says, “I was waiting for them to say it’s just a prank but they never did.” The influencer then tells viewers that every time she looks in the mirror she is “in love.”
“I’m in love with the tattoo and I’m in love with my boyfriend,” she said. “I think if you really love someone, you’ve just got to show it you know, you’ve just got to prove it…So I think if your girlfriend doesn’t want to tattoo your name on her face, you just need to find yourself a new girlfriend because I don’t think she loves you.”
Shocked by her comment, users jumped in saying she needs to reconsider her shows of love.
“‘if [your] girlfriend doesn’t want your name on the forehead she doesn’t love you,’” One netizen writes, quoting her. Then offering this advice to Kevin, the user continues, “dump her ASAP.”
Credit / South_agency / Getty.
Given the uncertainty of relationships, one netizen asks, “and if he breaks up with you what then?”
Stanskovsky answers: “What if we break up? I’ll just have to find myself a different Kevin.”
But one person has a better idea: “It would be better if you wrote on it that I am stupid.”
At the moment there’s been no response from Kevin.
What do you think of this woman getting her boyfriend’s name tattooed across her forehead?
There are far better ways of expressing your love, and if you insist on a grand gesture, maybe a smaller tattoo in a place it’s not so visible?
After A Teacher Corrected A Student’s Test, The Whole Town Wanted Her Fired
Pennsylvania father Chris Piland was appalled to see what his second-grader’s teacher had written on a paper that the student had turned in. In addition to bullying Piland’s young child, the instructor tried to make him feel foolish and humiliate him in front of his peers—exactly the opposite of what educators should be doing if they are committed to helping pupils learn.
What action did the teacher then take? The word “absolutely pathetic” was scribbled over the tiny boy’s assignment. Piland is now asking for the teacher’s termination due to the disrespectful remark.
Because they are employed at Valley View Elementary School, the teacher takes pleasure in getting paid on a regular basis. However, they have recently come under fire for misusing their authority over the children. Piland discovered that the teacher isn’t doing their job, in addition to learning that the teacher finds his young son’s intelligence to be “absolutely pathetic.”
The instructor has already been announced as Alyssa Rupp Bohenek. She wrote her remarks using a red pen, a symbol of subpar work from pupils. The entire sentence said:
How pathetic! In just three minutes, he responded to thirteen questions! wistful She grimaced in response to that.
The purpose was to determine the number of subtraction problems the second graders could complete. The teacher gave the class three minutes to finish them, and she was horrified to see that Piland’s son, who had the lowest performance in the class, could only finish thirteen of them.
Piland called Bohenek out for her animosity after she uploaded the assignment’s photo online.
“My son, Kamdyn’s teacher, has been so cruel to him and me for the entire year. That someone would write this on a child’s assignment and then bring it home enrages me beyond measure. Adorable source of inspiration,” he said next the image.
Piland didn’t want the teacher to get away with her crime against his child, so he started an online petition to try and have her fired so she could no longer abuse her position over any other young second-grade pupils.
The outrage compelled Rose Minniti, the superintendent of schools, to respond. She stated that she was informed about the test last week and that she has already set up a meeting with the teacher who is accused to investigate the allegations and decide if firing the teacher is the appropriate course of action.
According to Minniti, social media won’t affect how this personnel case turns out. The proof and the facts will decide it. We constantly try to strike a balance between the needs of the kids and the requirements to safeguard the worker who is the focus of the inquiry.
Bohenek has worked at the elementary school since 2013. Has she gotten tired of looking after the little children already? Based on the look of her response, it appears that she is over it.
Leave a Reply