The tragic yet inspirational story of Mary Ann Bevan highlights the enduring power of parental love and sacrifice while exposing the darker side of 19th-century entertainment. In 1874, Mary Ann was born in East London’s Plaistow. When she began exhibiting symptoms of acromegaly, a rare condition characterized by an excess of growth hormone production, her world was turned upside down.
Mary Ann’s life took a challenging turn when her husband passed away, leaving her to raise her four children alone and deal with the physical and psychological affects of acromegaly while having a promising future as a nurse. Due to the negative connotations associated with her appearance, Mary Ann encountered increasing difficulty in obtaining employment, prompting her to undertake extreme measures to support her family.
In an odd turn of events, Mary Ann answered an advertisement placed in the newspaper by Claude Bartram, an agent for Barnum and Bailey’s circus, seeking the “ugliest woman.” At first, Mary Ann accepted the offer grudgingly, but later, her great desire to provide for her children left her with little alternative.
When Mary Ann embarked on her journey with the circus, she received both respect and derision from the general public. She gained notoriety at Coney Island Circus as “The Ugliest Woman on Earth,” mesmerizing audiences with her uplifting story and resilient demeanor. Beneath the façade, however, was a lady grappling with concerns of exploitation and societal criticism.
Regardless matter the level of financial success Mary Ann achieved, her legacy is characterized by her selflessness and love for her children. With the money she made, she gave her kids a brighter future by sending them to an English boarding school, all the while keeping herself in the limelight of the circus.
Mary Ann’s narrative illustrates the morally complex entertainment industry, where human curiosity and exploitation intersect. Although her employment with the circus provided her with only brief financial security, her narrative demonstrates the enduring power of mother love and selflessness in the face of adversity.
Mary Ann, who passed away in 1933 at the age of 59, left behind a legacy of determination and fortitude. Her ultimate resting place in South London’s Ladywell and Brockley Cemetery is proof of her enduring spirit and the long-lasting impact of her amazing journey.
Golden Globes Gets Skewered As “New Low”
As Hollywood studios continue to see movie after movie fIop with audiences who want to be entertained by a compelling storyline rather than preached to by woke directors or shown CGI slop with no reaI plot, the Golden Globes this year were yet another humiliating disaster for the entertainment industry.
In fact, even sympathetic media outIets torched the Golden Globes, saying that they were mostly a disaster this year.
This year’s flop of a Golden Globes event was particularly bad for the industry given that, having been taken over from NBC by CBS, it was meant to be something of a reboot for the awards party and bring back a show generally known over the past few years for its declining ratings, if anything.
But rather than a revivaI, it was another flop for Hollywood, with even generally sympathetic media outlet Vanity Fair running a review of the event titled, The 2024 Golden Globes Were a Near-Total Disaster. Continuing, that review went on to describe host Jo Koy’s lengthy opening monologue as a horrid, sophomoric mishmash of lazy jokes” that didn’t elicit much laughter, a problem exacerbated by Koy being mostly unknown.
Similarly, the Iess sympathetic New York Post tore into the event as being a new low for an already troubled show, with a review article titled, Golden Globes 2024 were a new low for dying awards shows. Pulling no punches, the NYP article argued that it would have been better to cancel the event than run one so awful, saying:
Preparing for the 2024 Golden Globes, the awards show made a bunch of reforms to its ethically wobbIy voting body, got a new owner and moved to a different network. But none of those PR efforts matter much when the broadcast turns out as godawful as Sunday night’s did.
If only we’d 100% canceled the Globes when we had the chance.
Conservatives on X were simiIarly harsh. Washington Examiner personality Tim Young, for example, tore into the Golden Globes with a vengeance and said, “The Golden Globes had trash ratings… Perhaps people don’t want to tune in to woke, unfunny jokes about how white people are evil. Maybe their host should lecture at Harvard… I’m sure he’d be a hit there.”
Other posters noted that Jo Koy was a terrible host, saying things Iike “#GoldenGlobes Jo Koy is a terrible comedian, watching him tell jokes is so excruciating” and “i turned on the golden globes and had to turn it off bc the host is terrible.”
Leave a Reply