Mark Bryan is a robotics engineer who has been married for 11 years and has a daughter. He identifies as straight and chooses to dress unconventionally. Bryan is an American living in Germany, and he doesn’t believe that fashion has to be gendered. You can find Bryan wearing a skirt and heels to work or out anywhere else he goes on any given day.
Bryan said he doesn’t like how limited men’s choices are in the fashion department, especially when it comes to office attire. Men’s pants only come in a few colors, mostly black, gray, dark blue and the occasional pinstripe, and cuts.
The stylish dresser believes that if women are allowed to wear pants, men should be able to wear skirts and dresses as well. Bryan likes how skirts come in many styles and patterns – and many more colors – unlike men’s clothing.
Bryan prefers to mix traditional gender looks by wearing masculine attire on his top half, like a blazer and tie, and traditionally feminine attire on the bottom half. He will typically wear a pencil skirt and four-inch heels on the bottom.
Wearing high heels is no problem for Bryan. He first learned how to do it when his college girlfriend asked him to wear high heels while dancing with her so that they were on the same level. They continued this for over a year.
Bryan doesn’t let stereotypes or assumptions stop him from dressing in a way that brings him joy. He challenges expectations and does so unapologetically. Keep reading to hear what Bryan has to say about his fashion choices.
Bryan has a very clear idea about how he likes to dress. He told Bored Panda: “To me, clothes have no gender. I prefer skirts to dresses. Dresses don’t allow me to mix the genders. I prefer a ‘masculine’ look above the waist and a non-gendered look below the waist. It’s all about clothes having no gender.”
He continued: “I am old enough to remember that in school, the girls could not wear pants. Pants have now become a non-gendered article of clothing. So why can’t skirts and heels be non-gendered? Besides, men wore heels before women did. Maybe not today’s stiletto-style heels, but men did wear heels before women.”
Bryan is correct about that. High heels can look back on a long history. Although historians and archaeologists cannot date their invention clearly, they have been around at least since the 10th century. And they were not a fashion statement at first. No, the first recorded use of high heels was eminently practical: the Persian cavalry wore boots with heels, called a kalash or galesh, that made it easier for them to keep their feet inside their stirrups. This is, by the way, the same reason why cowboy boots have a small heel as well!
Since owning a horse was a sign of wealth, only well-off men could afford to wear these high-heeled boots. The use of them slowly spread across Europe, and high heels heels became one of the fashion signs of rich noblemen or traders. In fact, following the Great Schism of the Christian Church in the 11th century, even the pope wore high heels.
It wasn’t until several hundred years later that fashion slowly changed. During the 18th century, cultural concerns in Europe came up about the distinction between males and females and talk about what men and women should wear arose. This is the point in time where the belief that fashion is something effeminate and frivolous that “real men” shouldn’t care about hails from. Due to these changing beliefs, men largely abandoned high heels heels, as they were seen as impractical and mere accessories.
Bryan is one of the examples of how high-heels are slowly coming back as an accepted form of footwear for men. Although the engineer champions the option of wearing high-heeled shoes for men, he understands many people will look twice when they see him. He compares his style choices to someone who chooses to dye their hair bright colors. He explained:
“Take a person with bright green hair. Green hair is not normal. You look up and see this person, your mind tells you it’s a person with green hair, you think to yourself, that’s odd or interesting, then you go back to do what you were doing and don’t give it another thought. I believe this is the same when people see me in a skirt and heels.”
Bryan doesn’t have to struggle to find skirts and heels that fit him either. He wears a size 8 in skirts, and with smaller feet for a man, his shoe size in heels is 8.5. If you know a man who is considering trying out wearing heels and skirts too, Bryan suggests starting with a lower heel until you feel more comfortable walking in high heels.
What do you think of Mark Bryan’s style choices? Do you know any men who would try walking in high heels? Let us know, and be sure to send this along to your friends and family.
Mother Upset As Vet Refuses Treatment For Son Identifying As A Cat
Amid the immense ocean of viral videos on the internet, one specific video has sparked curiosity throughout the world. An average American mother finds herself at the center of a story that subverts social standards in novel ways in a time when digital buzz spreads more quickly than ever.
The American mother is shown telling her confusing story in a video that was posted by a British commentator who seemed to be predicting the downfall of society. She discloses her son’s unwavering conviction that he is a cat. What comes next is a discussion that defies logic and sparks conversations on the periphery of skepticism and societal acceptability.
The mother’s lament lies at the heart of the controversy: she claims that a veterinarian refused to cure her kid despite his unwavering declaration of feline identity, citing the unquestionable fact of his human physiology. The mother’s complaint centers on this conflict between subjective identity and objective reality, which highlights the difficulties associated with inclusivity and discrimination.
The mother believes that her son’s identification as a cat goes beyond simple whimsy and is a fundamental part of who he is that should be accepted and accommodated. She fervently contends that her son should be accorded the same rights and benefits as any other member of society due to his self-professed identity. She views the denial of veterinary care as discrimination because of his human biology, and it serves as a sobering reminder of the prejudices that still exist in an otherwise enlightened society.
The mother chooses not to sue the veterinarian in spite of her frustration. Rather, she calls for a wider transformation in cultural view and the embrace of those who identify as anything other than human. She is adamant that people who identify as animals should receive veterinary care; this plea highlights the dynamic nature of identity politics and the significance of empathy.
As the video has gone viral, emotions have been mixed. In conservative sectors, it is seen as a symbol of society’s decline. They see the mother’s testimony as a break from conventional wisdom and a warning of society collapse, a viewpoint that is supported by the pessimistic forecasts made by the British analyst who first shared the film.
But in the middle of the contentious discussion, there’s a moving analysis of the intricacies of human identity and the forward motion of society. The mother’s battle to get her son to acknowledge that he is a cat is a reflection of larger battles for inclusivity and acceptance, upending conventional wisdom and fostering a greater understanding of human nature.
In the end, the widely shared film serves as evidence of the complex aspects of modern society, which is battling issues of social cohesion, prejudice, and identity complexities. It exhorts us to face our prejudices and accept, with compassion and an open mind, the diversity of human experience. The acceptance of one another’s uniqueness is what actually ties the human race together in compassion and harmony.
Leave a Reply