Starbucks India stirred controversy and faced calls for boycotts following the release of a commercial set in India that sparked objections, particularly from the right-wing community. The company drew criticism for its latest promotional campaign, which portrayed parents meeting their transgender daughter at a Starbucks outlet.
In the video, a father initially grapples with accepting his daughter’s transition but eventually embraces it by ordering a drink for her under her new name. Starbucks India shared the video on Twitter with the caption, “Your name defines who you are – whether it’s Arpit or Arpita. At Starbucks, we love and accept you for who you are. Because being yourself means everything to us. #ItStartsWithYourName.”
The advertisement faced significant backlash, with political commentator Rukshan Fernando tweeting, “Starbucks facing backlash in India after adopting a full Bud Light approach. Introducing a mediocre US coffee brand to the market wasn’t bad enough; now they bring their woke corporate culture to the Subcontinent.”
In Starbucks India’s comment section, one user expressed dismay, stating, “It’s deeply concerning to witness the rapid erosion of cultural identity in our era. Certain liberal forces persistently normalize practices that seem to undermine our cherished traditions and values.”
Another user questioned Starbucks India’s marketing approach, commenting, “I’m a huge Starbucks fan and spend thousands of rupees in their coffee shops annually. But I can’t comprehend why @StarbucksIndia would launch a woke campaign under the guise of advertising? Can’t they just promote their coffee and service in India?”
A different comment criticized the promotion of what they deemed “immoral values,” asserting, “What are you promoting @Starbucks… Don’t endorse such cultural shifts… We don’t need any lessons on accepting such immoral values… We are Bharatvasis, and we take pride in our civilization.”
“I don’t understand why brands do this… these ads alienate huge portions of the population. Whatever happened to common-sense advertising? Videos like this alienate more customers than they attract. Literally wasting advertising dollars just to virtue signal,” expressed another disgruntled individual.
Watch the controversial ad here:
America has exported woke culture all around the globe, and Starbucks India just provided yet another example of this phenomenon. Since the end of World War II, the United States has been the global hegemon of liberalism, and many other nations have sought to mimic its cuIture.
Fierce argument between Karen Grassle and Michael Landon while ‘Little House on the Prairie’ was being filmed
As Caroline Ingalls in Little House on the Prairie, Karen Grassle rose to prominence as an actress. There are still people that watch this series because of how much people adored it.
Karen described an entirely different mood from her point of view, despite the fact that most of the performers spoke about the fantastic atmosphere that existed during the filming.
Little House on the Prairie is a classic program that has been shown in more than 100 countries and hasn’t been totally discontinued since 1974. Many actors’ careers have been aided by the show by their roles in the series.
Despite his tragic 1991 death, actor Michael Landon is still remembered when this series is mentioned.
For this series, Karen Grassle is also well-known. Born in 1942, she followed her dream of being an artist. After graduating from the University of California, she studied at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts in London before coming back to the United States.
For Karen Grassle, opportunities presented themselves in perfect timing. Karen was supposed to appear in another project when the series’ auditions were held, but she had to go to Los Angeles for that part and couldn’t get tickets. Her agency then contacted and offered her a part in the series alongside Michael Landon. Despite not being a TV show enthusiast, Karen made the decision to attend the interview.
Subsequently, she said that during the Caroline Ingalls role interview, she was by herself. She added that everyone in the interview was exhausted because they had already cast everyone else, but that she was invited to go to the wardrobe after just a few lines.
When Karen received the part, she admitted that she was a little nervous about what lay ahead, but Landon always made the other people on set laugh and feel good. He was under a great deal of pressure. Karen greatly benefited from her decision to base her part on her mother’s experiences.
While filming is enjoyable, Karen felt that since she is one of the main characters and the show has grown in popularity, she should be paid more. This sparked a furious argument between her and Michael Landon, her coworker. She claimed that when she tried to renegotiate the contract, Michael refused to pay her more money. A rift developed in their relationship as a result of this disagreement.
The two had a cordial phone conversation prior to the actor’s passing, but Karen refrained from discussing the event and the breakup in their relationship at the time in public.
Michael’s widow, Cindy, claimed that despite his serious appearance, her husband was a great parent, deeply devoted about his career, and always arrived home smiling.
No matter how big or tiny their involvement on the show was, Michael made everyone feel important and happy during production, according to the other performers who appeared in Little House on the Prairie. Additionally, Michael was regarded as a true professional by Dean Butler, who played Landon, and had nothing but positive things to say about him. Michael wanted everyone’s experience to be more pleasurable and straightforward.
Michael also made an effort to ensure that the performers could get home in time for supper with their families. He thought that success came from striking a balance between one’s personal and
Leave a Reply