Even though Simone Biles is the most decorated U.S. Olympic gymnast with over 35 medals and the Presidential Medal of Freedom, some people still criticize her.
One person complained, “Simone Biles’ hair never looks right. Everyone else on the team looks put together, but she looks like she just rolled out of bed.”
Before the women’s gymnastics team finals, Simone Biles, 27, shared a message for her critics on her Instagram Story.
“Don’t comment on my hair,” Simone Biles wrote in a video she posted. “It was done, but the bus had no AC and it was super hot. Plus, the ride was 45 minutes.”
In another Instagram Story, she shared a selfie and said, “Gonna hold your hand when I say this
Next time you want to comment on a Black girl’s hair, JUST DON’T.”\PARIS, FRANCE – JULY 30: Simone Biles of Team United States reacts after finishing her routine on the uneven bars during the Artistic Gymnastics Women’s Team Final on day four of the Olympic Games Paris 2024 at Bercy Arena on July 30, 2024 in Paris, France. (Photo by Jamie Squire/Getty Images)
Many women usually wear their hair in a slicked-back ponytail or bun, but Simone Biles has been wearing a looser style.
The rules say USA gymnasts must be “well groomed” and keep their hair “secured away from the face” so it doesn’t block their view of the equipment.
Despite the rules, many people on social media have criticized Simone Biles’ hairstyle.
Comments include:
“Simone Biles’s hair stylist should be fired.”
“Did Simone Biles purposely not do her hair? Every other gymnast’s hair is neatly done, but hers is messy. It almost seems on purpose… wtf?”
“I know Simone Biles talked about hair comments in her documentary, but she needs someone else to do her hair, not just her mom.”
“Simone Biles is flawless, but her hair isn’t.”
I don’t see anything wrong with Simone’s hair. She’s following the rules, so she should be able to wear it however she wants. People need to leave her alone!
Share if you agree!
Here Is Why They Are Getting Rid Of All Their Self-Service Checkout Machines
During a time when seIf-administration checkouts have turned into the standard in stores, one UK basic food item chain is taking a striking action by getting back to completely staffed checkouts.
Corners, an upmarket general store chain with 27 stores across Northern Britain in Lancashire, Cumbria, Yorkshire, and Cheshire, has chosen to say goodbye to the majority of its seIf-administration works, focusing on human association and client assistance over robotization.
Corners, frequently named the “northern Waitrose” because of its standing for quaIity and client support, has taken a novel position on this. The choice to eliminate self-administration checkouts was incited by client input and a longing to give a more private shopping experience.
Stalls overseeing chief, Nigel Murray, underscored their obligation to consumer loyalty, expressing, Our clients have Iet us know this over the long haul, that oneself sweep machines that we have in our stores can be slow, temperamental, and unoriginal.
The transition to once again introduce human clerks into most Stalls stores Iines up with the general store’s benefits of advertising elevated degrees of warm, individual consideration. In a time where computerization and man-made reasoning have become progressively common in the retaiI area, Corners is standing firm for “genuine knowledge” given by human clerks.
Stalls’ choice has ignited an energetic discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of seIf-administration checkouts, particularly with regards to the continuous issue of shoplifting. The English Free Retailers Affiliation (BIRA) has brought up that the ongoing degree of retail robbery represents a critical test for retailers depending on self-administration works, which can turn into a costIy gamble.
This brings up issues about the adequacy of robotized checkout frameworks in hindering robbery and the generaI money saving advantage examination for retailers.
The transition to get back to completely staffed checkouts is certainIy not a one-size-fits-all choice for Stalls, as they intend to keep up with self-administration works in only two of their stores — those situated in the Lake Locale at Keswick and Windermere.
These exemptions depend on the stores elevated degrees of client traffic, where the accommodation of seIf-administration might in any case be liked.
Stalls, with its rich history tracing all the way back to 1847, remains as a demonstration of the getting through worth of individual client care.
In a retail scene over whelmed by comfort and robotization, the grocery store chain is putting an accentuation on the human touch, recognizing the significance of eye to eye connections in encouraging client dependability.
Leave a Reply