Few things are as satisfying as a trip down memory lane — and it’s even better when you find something you didn’t notice before. Because as Ferris Bueller said — life moves pretty fast. Here are dozens of pictures of celebrities and remarkable people of yesteryear in all their beautiful, vintage glory. The glamour, the fashions, the hair — whether classically elegant, effortlessly cool, or interestingly tacky, we shall not see their like again. Here’s to the movie stars who were larger than life, here’s to the rock stars who lived on the edge, here’s to the comedians who still make us smile, here’s to the bit players who had those moments of glory that changed their lives forever. It’s all good, it’s all groovy, and the rest is history.
Perhaps it was her Scandinavian free-spiritedness — Swedish-born actress and singer Ann-Margret seemed on call to be as sexy as necessary. Need an actress to smother Jack Nicholson with her cleavage? Ann-Margret would do it (in Carnal Knowledge, 1972). Need an actress to writhe in satin sheets and foam, then get sprayed by baked beans? Ann-Margret’s your girl (in Tommy, 1975). Need an actress to ride a large motorcycle in a thigh-high sweater dress and calf-high boots? Ann-Margret’s raring to go (in The Prophet, 1968). Need an actress who can shake her fringe top and miniskirt like a professional go-go dancer? Ann-Margret has that exact skill (in Appointment in Beirut, 1969). Need an actress you could cover in fluorescent paint and drag around a canvas like a human paintbrush while burly men in tribal garb howl and beat their bongos? That was so Ann-Margret’s thing (in The Swinger, 1966). Need an actress to wear a bra at a photo shoot on a chilly day? Not her thing, man.–Advertisment–
“Jungle Pam” Hardy, one of drag racing’s main attractions in the ’70s.
Jim Liberman was a drag racer who went by the nickname of “Jungle Jim.” He won a lot of races in the 1970s. Fans loved him for his flamboyant personality and masterful driving. But this is not a picture of Jungle Jim — this is “Jungle Pam” Hardy, Jim’s sidekick, who commanded attention at the track with her tight, skimpy outfits. She had a job to do, as Jim’s “backup girl,” she helped guide him as he drove his Chevy Vega backward on the track after a burnout. Pam joined Jim’s team in 1973, and in 1977 Jim died on an off-track car accident. Though she only did the job for four years, Jungle Pam remains the most iconic backup girl in drag racing history.
Burt Reynolds and Farrah Fawcett during filming of the 1981 comedy “The Cannonball Run.”
The 1981 road-racing comedy The Cannonball Run was packed with star power: Dean Martin, Sammy Davis Jr., Adrienne Barbeau, Mel Tillis, Terry Bradshaw, Dom DeLuise, Jackie Chan and 007 himself, Roger Moore. But you could have left all of them on the side of the road and powered to box office success with this supernaturally attractive pair of human beings: Burt Reynolds and Farrah Fawcett. He was the greatest heartthrob of the late ’70s; she had the decade’s hottest poster, and was the hottest lady detective on Charlie’s Angels, a show that was completely about conspicuously hot lady detectives. The chemistry in the movie (and this photo) wasn’t fake — Fawcett and Reynolds were romantically involved for a time.
Marcia, Marcia, Marcia! You’re gonna lose! Lose! Lose! A miffed Maureen McCormick on The Brady Bunch, 1972.
Be honest — which of these three sparklers from 1983 would you have pegged to be the future governor of Minnesota? History tells us it was Jesse “the Body” Ventura (at right), and not Randy “Macho Man” Savage or the lovely Elizabeth “Miss Elizabeth” Hulette. Randy and Elizabeth would marry the following year, and she would later debut in the WWF as Macho Man’s mysterious, glamorous manager. Sadly, neither Macho Man nor Elizabeth are with us today. Ventura, who served one term as governor and has since remained a popular political figure, occasionally floats the idea of a bid for the U.S. presidency. That seems far-fetched, as American voters would never make a crass TV blowhard the leader of the free world.
Cindy Morgan as ‘Lacey Underall’ in a scene from the comedy film “Caddyshack,” 1980.
Kevin Costner, the famous Hollywood actor and director, is currently facing a Iawsuit
Kevin Costner, the famous Hollywood actor and director, is currently facing a Iawsuit from his neighbor over a view.
The lawsuit alleges that Costner’s property obstructs the neighbor’s scenic view of the Pacific Ocean. The dispute has drawn attention due to the high-profile nature of the parties invoIved, as well as the potential implications for property rights and zoning laws.
Costner is no stranger to lawsuits as reported by The Hollywood Reporter:
The lawsuit was filed by Rick Grimm, a retired professor, who owns a property adjacent to Costner’s estate in Carpinteria, California. Grimm claims that Costner’s constru ction of a berm and the planting of trees have obstructed his view of the ocean.
Grimm alleges that the berm and trees were intentionally placed by Costner to block his view, and that the construction vioIates local zoning laws. Kevin Costner’s representatives have denied the allegations, stating that the berm and trees were installed for erosion controI and that they do not significantly impact Grimm’s view. They also argue that Grimm’s claim is baseless, as he does not own the right to an unobstructed view. The dispute has yet to be resolved, and both parties are expected to present their arguments in court.
The lawsuit raises severaI questions about property rights and zoning laws. While homeowners generally have the right to enjoy their property as they see fit, there are limits to what they can do with their land. Zoning laws, which vary by location, regulate the use and development of land in a given area. These laws are designed to promote public safety, preserve natural resources, and maintain the character of a neighborhood.
In this case, Grimm argues that Costner’s construction vioIates zoning laws, as it obstructs his view and alters the character of the neighborhood. Costner’s representatives counter that the construction is within the bounds of the law and does not significantly impact Grimm’s view.
The outcome of the lawsuit could have significant implications for property owners and zoning laws. If Grimm prevails, it could establish a precedent that home owners must consider their neighbors’ views when making aIterations to their property.
This could make it more difficult for home owners to make changes to their homes or land, particularly in areas with strict zoning laws.
On the other hand, if Costner prevaiIs, it could reinforce the principle that property owners have the right to enjoy their land as they see fit, within the bounds of the law. This could make it easier for homeowners to make changes to their property without fear of legal repercussions, although they may still need to comply with zoning regulations.
The Iawsuit between Kevin Costner and his neighbor over a view raises important questions about property rights and zoning laws. While the outcome is uncertain, the case highlights the importance of considering the impact of property alterations on neighbors and the surrounding community.
Leave a Reply